{"id":5098,"date":"2026-02-07T12:33:14","date_gmt":"2026-02-07T12:33:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/"},"modified":"2026-02-07T12:33:14","modified_gmt":"2026-02-07T12:33:14","slug":"quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/","title":{"rendered":"Modern chiropractic vs. traditional concepts"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_82_1 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewbox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewbox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseprofile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Quiropractica_moderna_vs_conceptos_tradicionales_definiciones_y_diferencias_clinicas_relevantes\" >Modern chiropractic vs. traditional concepts: definitions and relevant clinical differences<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Definiciones_operativas\" >Operational definitions<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Diferencias_clinicas_relevantes\" >Relevant clinical differences<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Practica_y_limites_profesionales\" >Practice and professional boundaries<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Evidencia_cientifica_actual_que_se_sabe_sobre_resultados_y_seguridad_en_la_quiropractica_moderna_frente_al_enfoque_tradicional\" >Current scientific evidence: what is known about outcomes and safety in modern chiropractic versus the traditional approach<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Resultados_clinicos\" >Clinical results<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Seguridad_y_riesgos\" >Security and risks<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Limitaciones_de_la_evidencia_y_comparacion_entre_enfoques\" >Limitations of the evidence and comparison of approaches<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Indicaciones_y_limites_de_uso_en_que_situaciones_se_valora_la_quiropractica_y_cuando_conviene_evitarla\" >Indications and limits of use: in which situations is chiropractic valued and when should it be avoided?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Cuando_puede_valorarse_su_uso\" >When its use can be assessed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Cuando_conviene_evitarla_o_posponerla\" >When to avoid or postpone it<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Formacion_regulacion_y_tecnicas_como_difiere_la_practica_contemporanea_de_las_corrientes_clasicas\" >Training, regulation and techniques: how contemporary practice differs from classical trends<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Formacion\" >Training<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Regulacion\" >Regulation<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Tecnicas\" >Techniques<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Integracion_en_el_sistema_sanitario_colaboracion_interdisciplinaria_hoy_vs_la_vision_tradicional_de_ejercicio_independiente\" >Integration in the healthcare system: interdisciplinary collaboration today vs. the traditional view of independent practice<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/quiropractica-moderna-vs-conceptos-tradicionales\/#Diferencias_operativas_clave\" >Key operational differences<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Quiropractica_moderna_vs_conceptos_tradicionales_definiciones_y_diferencias_clinicas_relevantes\"><\/span>Modern chiropractic vs. traditional concepts: definitions and relevant clinical differences<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Definiciones_operativas\"><\/span>Operational definitions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Traditional chiropractic often focuses on the <b>vertebral subluxation<\/b> as an explanatory axis of multiple dysfunctions, proposing the <b>spinal adjustment\/manipulation<\/b> as the main intervention to \u201ccorrect\u201d it. Modern chiropractic, on the other hand, adopts a <b>evidence-based approach<\/b> and the <b>biopsychosocial model<\/b>, by limiting its scope to problems <b>musculoskeletal<\/b> and employing clinical assessment strategies, education, exercise and manual techniques selected according to indication and safety. It does not assume that spinal interventions modify systemic diseases nor does it extrapolate effects beyond what is supported by the available scientific literature.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Diferencias_clinicas_relevantes\"><\/span>Relevant clinical differences<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>In the assessment, the modern approach prioritises structured anamnesis, neuromusculoskeletal examination, screening for <b>RED FLAGS<\/b> and the <b>risk stratification<\/b>, reserving imaging for justified clinical criteria. In planning, the tendency is towards limited treatment episodes, measurable objectives and periodic re-evaluation, with a preference for the <b>therapeutic multimodality<\/b> (e.g. education and exercise) and shared decision-making. Traditional approaches tend to place greater weight on repeated subluxation-oriented adjustment and predefined frequency schemes. In clinical communication, the modern framework avoids deterministic attributions, encourages realistic expectations and discourages unnecessary dependency.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Practica_y_limites_profesionales\"><\/span>Practice and professional boundaries<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Modern chiropractic emphasizes the <b>informed consent<\/b>, The recording of functional outcomes, technical adaptation to co-morbidities and timely referral when warning signs, progressive deficits or lack of reasonable clinical response appear. Interprofessional integration and respect for practice limits are central: safety is prioritised, techniques are adjusted to contraindications, and it is recognised that not all musculoskeletal conditions benefit from the same approach or require manipulation. These guidelines seek consistency with clinical guidelines and prudent, person-centred practice and ongoing assessment of the risk-benefit balance.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Evidencia_cientifica_actual_que_se_sabe_sobre_resultados_y_seguridad_en_la_quiropractica_moderna_frente_al_enfoque_tradicional\"><\/span>Current scientific evidence: what is known about outcomes and safety in modern chiropractic versus the traditional approach<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Resultados_clinicos\"><\/span>Clinical results<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The <b>modern chiropractic<\/b>, aligned with guidelines and with musculoskeletal diagnostics, usually combines <b>spinal manipulation<\/b> o mobilisation with therapeutic exercise and education. The <b>scientific evidence<\/b> describes modest improvements in pain and function, especially in the short term, in conditions such as mechanical low back and neck pain and certain cervical headaches, especially when integrated with active strategies. The magnitude and duration of effect varies between studies and techniques. The <b>traditional approach<\/b> based on the correction of the \u201c<b>vertebral subluxation<\/b>\u201dand for broad systemic effects the evidence is inconclusive, and for non-musculoskeletal conditions the evidence is limited or inconsistent.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Seguridad_y_riesgos\"><\/span>Security and risks<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Spinal manipulation and mobilisation are associated with frequent but generally mild and transient adverse effects (local pain, stiffness, brief headache). The following have been reported <b>serious adverse events<\/b> rare after procedures - especially cervical - such as vascular or neurological injuries, with a causal relationship that is not always clear. The risk may be increased by <b>RED FLAGS<\/b> or comorbidities; therefore, contemporary practice emphasises clinical history, neurological examination, informed consent and selection of less aggressive techniques when appropriate. Contraindications or prior referral are usually considered:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Progressive neurological deficit or suspected cauda equina syndrome.<\/li>\n<li>Suspected or confirmed vertebral fracture, tumour or infection.<\/li>\n<li>Known or recent cervical vascular disorders.<\/li>\n<li>Severe osteoporosis or marked bone fragility.<\/li>\n<li>Uncontrolled anticoagulation or bleeding disorders.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Limitaciones_de_la_evidencia_y_comparacion_entre_enfoques\"><\/span>Limitations of the evidence and comparison of approaches<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The literature presents heterogeneity of techniques, populations and outcome measures, with few direct comparisons between <b>modern chiropractic<\/b> y <b>traditional approach<\/b>. No clear and generalisable superiority can be established; outcomes depend on clinical indication, practitioner and adherence to multimodal strategies. Broad claims about the \u201c<b>vertebral subluxation<\/b>\u201das a cause of systemic disease lacks robust confirmation. A prudent approach prioritises diagnosis, individualised selection of techniques, periodic reassessment and coordination with other interventions where appropriate.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Indicaciones_y_limites_de_uso_en_que_situaciones_se_valora_la_quiropractica_y_cuando_conviene_evitarla\"><\/span>Indications and limits of use: in which situations is chiropractic valued and when should it be avoided?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Cuando_puede_valorarse_su_uso\"><\/span>When its use can be assessed<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Low back pain of origin <b>non-specific mechanical<\/b>, without warning signs, following appropriate clinical assessment.<\/li>\n<li>Mechanical cervical pain and cervical stiffness with segmental dysfunction, without structural instability.<\/li>\n<li>Chest or limb pain of probable origin <b>musculoskeletal<\/b> (once visceral causes have been ruled out).<\/li>\n<li>Some <b>headaches of cervical origin<\/b> suspected, within a conservative and supervised approach.<\/li>\n<li>Limited mobility due to <b>joint hypomobility<\/b>, as part of a multimodal plan with exercise and education.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Cuando_conviene_evitarla_o_posponerla\"><\/span>When to avoid or postpone it<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><b>Red flags<\/b>suspected infection, fracture, cancer or undiagnosed systemic pathology.<\/li>\n<li><b>Progressive neurological deficits<\/b>, The following conditions may be present: atherosclerosis, cauda equina syndrome, myelopathy, marked loss of strength or sphincter disturbances.<\/li>\n<li>Background on <b>cervical arterial dissection<\/b>, recent TIA\/stroke or significant vascular disease of the neck.<\/li>\n<li><b>Severe osteoporosis<\/b>, vertebral instability, unstable spondylolisthesis or recent surgery in the region to be treated.<\/li>\n<li><b>Anticoagulation<\/b> o bleeding disorders: avoid high speed\/high amplitude techniques.<\/li>\n<li>Acute disc herniation with medically unassessed severe radiculopathy, or rapidly progressive pain.<\/li>\n<li>High-risk pregnancy or <b>fragility<\/b> marked: prioritise low-intensity techniques and individual assessment.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Indication should be based on anamnesis, examination and ruling out red flags. High-speed manipulation is not essential; lower intensity techniques may be preferred or integrated with therapeutic exercise and education, adjusting the plan according to clinical response and patient safety.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Formacion_regulacion_y_tecnicas_como_difiere_la_practica_contemporanea_de_las_corrientes_clasicas\"><\/span>Training, regulation and techniques: how contemporary practice differs from classical trends<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Formacion\"><\/span>Training<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Contemporary practice prioritises a <b>competence-based training<\/b>, The training is supervised, with continuous updating and research literacy to critically interpret the evidence. In contrast to the classical trends, more focused on doctrinal schools and prolonged learning trajectories with less standardisation, today emphasis is placed on transversal skills: case formulation, risk assessment, clinical communication and interprofessional work. Structured supervision and ethical reflection are part of the training process from early stages.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Regulacion\"><\/span>Regulation<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Currently, there is a predominant <b>professional regulation<\/b> more explicit: protected titles, accreditation criteria, codes of ethics, informed consent, data protection and continuing professional development requirements. Although historically there was greater heterogeneity and less external supervision, today minimum standards for safe practice, audit mechanisms and complaint routes are established, as well as delimitation of the scope of action and referral protocols when clinical complexity requires it.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Tecnicas\"><\/span>Techniques<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Contemporary practice adopts a <b>evidence-informed integration<\/b>, It uses manualised interventions where appropriate and combines them with individualised formulations. Transdiagnostic and modular approaches are used, consideration of cultural and trauma factors, and adjustments based on <b>systematic measurement of clinical outcomes<\/b> without assuming guaranteed improvements. The prudent use of digital tools, adherence monitoring and the identification of indications and contraindications guide the technical choice, prioritising safety, proportionality and transparency in the limits of each method.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Integracion_en_el_sistema_sanitario_colaboracion_interdisciplinaria_hoy_vs_la_vision_tradicional_de_ejercicio_independiente\"><\/span>Integration in the healthcare system: interdisciplinary collaboration today vs. the traditional view of independent practice<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>The traditional view of the <b>independent practice<\/b> focuses on professional autonomy and episodic patient management, with mainly individual clinical decisions and poorly standardised referral circuits. In contrast, the <b>interdisciplinary collaboration<\/b> The current system of care is organised around multidisciplinary teams, with defined roles, clinical sessions and care pathways that prioritise the <b>continuity of care<\/b>, coordination between levels and the <b>patient safety<\/b>. This approach is supported by risk management tools, structured communication and interoperable information systems.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Diferencias_operativas_clave\"><\/span>Key operational differences<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><b>Roles and responsibilities:<\/b> in independent practice, individual delimitation; in teams, competency matrix and shared clinical leadership.<\/li>\n<li><b>Communication and documentation:<\/b> spot reports vs. common notes and plans in <b>electronic medical records<\/b> with access according to professional profile.<\/li>\n<li><b>Decision-making:<\/b> individual judgement vs. consensus decision in case committees, with escalation criteria and second opinions.<\/li>\n<li><b>Referral and access:<\/b> professional discretion vs. <b>shared protocols<\/b> referral, prioritisation and follow-up.<\/li>\n<li><b>Quality and safety:<\/b> personal evaluation of results vs. process indicators and audits of <b>clinical governance<\/b> (adverse events, medication reconciliation, safe transitions).<\/li>\n<li><b>Inter-level coordination:<\/b> isolated episodes vs integrated care pathways between primary care, specialised care and community resources.<\/li>\n<li><b>Ethical and legal framework:<\/b> individual liability and consents per act vs. <b>informed consent<\/b> integrated, data protection and co-responsibility agreements between entities.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Implementing integrated models requires clinical leadership, standardisation of processes, technical interoperability, interprofessional training and protected time for coordination. Barriers such as organisational fragmentation, administrative burden or poorly aligned incentives persist. Collaboration does not replace professional responsibility, but rather articulates it within agreed and assessable frameworks. Its adoption should be adjusted to the local context and monitored with traceable metrics of safety, efficiency and patient experience, avoiding unjustified extrapolations.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Quiropr\u00e1ctica moderna vs conceptos tradicionales: definiciones y diferencias cl\u00ednicas relevantes Definiciones operativas La quiropr\u00e1ctica tradicional suele centrarse en la subluxaci\u00f3n vertebral como eje explicativo de m\u00faltiples disfunciones, proponiendo el ajuste\/manipulaci\u00f3n espinal como intervenci\u00f3n principal para \u201ccorregirla\u201d. La quiropr\u00e1ctica moderna, en cambio, adopta un enfoque basado en la evidencia y el modelo biopsicosocial, delimitando su campo [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5111,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5098","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-educacion-quiropractica"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5098","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5098"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5098\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5111"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5098"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5098"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saludquiropractica.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5098"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}